Skip to main content

In the realm of agile project management, having a solid grasp of Agile Story Points is essential for project estimation and planning. However, despite its significance, several experts find it challenging to comprehend the concept and utilize story points effectively in their tasks.

This blog post is a comprehensive guide on Agile Story Points that will help you improve your ability to estimate tasks with greater accuracy.

We’ll discuss the significance of story points as a measure of effort and how they foster collaboration among diverse team members. We will also explore why equating story points with hours can be problematic, leading to inaccurate plans based on individual performance.

Furthermore, we’ll delve into why abstraction should remain at the core of agile estimation by embracing relative units instead of fixed hour values. A real-life example will demonstrate potential issues when using hour equivalence in sprint planning sessions involving developers with varying skill levels.

Finally, we’ll examine the distribution relationship between story points and hours while emphasizing the role velocity plays in interpreting these estimations. By gaining a deeper understanding of Agile Story Points through this post, you’ll be better equipped to communicate with stakeholders using relative effort estimations and improve overall project management success.

 

Table of Contents:

The Importance of Story Points

Story points are a crucial aspect of agile project management, allowing teams to estimate the amount of work collaboratively and plan accurately. They provide an abstract yet meaningful unit for measuring effort, which is essential for forecasting and tracking progress. Story points are usually used when estimating the relative size of a story. Pointing is usually done during Sprint Planning.

Understanding Story Points as a Measure of Effort

In agile projects, story points represent the relative difficulty or complexity of user stories or product backlog items. Unlike traditional time-based estimates, story points focus on the overall effort required to complete tasks, accounting for factors such as uncertainty, risk, and technical debt.

Facilitating Collaboration Among Diverse Team Members

Estimating story points involves techniques like Planning Poker, encouraging open discussion among team members. By using these approaches, agile teams can better understand each other’s perspectives on task complexity and reach agreement on what constitutes a “baseline” story.

  • Sprint Planning: During sprint planning sessions, scrum teams use baseline stories to compare new product backlog items’ size and complexity against known reference examples, allocating resources more effectively.
  • Team’s Velocity: By tracking the number of story points completed per sprint, agile teams can calculate their average sprint velocity, providing valuable insights into performance and informing future work allocation and project timelines.
  • Continuous Improvement: Regularly reviewing and adjusting story point estimates allows scrum team members to refine their understanding of task complexity over time, leading to more accurate planning and improved project management.

Understanding story points as an abstract measure of effort is essential for effective collaboration among diverse team members in agile projects. By focusing on relative difficulty rather than fixed hour values, teams can create more accurate plans that account for uncertainty while fostering open communication during estimation sessions.

Key Takeaway: 

Story points are a crucial aspect of agile project management, allowing teams to estimate the amount of work collaboratively and plan accurately. They represent the relative difficulty or complexity of user stories or product backlog items and facilitate collaboration among diverse team members by encouraging open discussion during estimation sessions. Agile teams can calculate their average sprint velocity by tracking completed story points per sprint, leading to more accurate planning and improved project management over time.

Using The Fibonacci sequence with Story Points

The Fibonacci sequence is exceptionally helpful when using story points for Agile estimation due to its non-linear nature. This sequence, which goes like 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, and so on, reflects the inherent uncertainty and complexity in progressively larger tasks. When assigning story points, lower numbers represent simpler or less time-consuming tasks, while higher numbers signify more complex tasks with greater uncertainty. This approach encourages breaking down larger tasks into smaller, more manageable parts, improving estimation accuracy. Importantly, it also reinforces the understanding that precision decreases as the task size increases, helping teams to manage expectations better and plan more effectively.

Here’s a step-by-step guide on how you can use it:

1. Understand the Fibonacci Sequence: The Fibonacci sequence is a series of numbers in which each number is the sum of the two preceding ones. It goes like 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, and so on. In Agile, the sequence typically starts from 1.

2. Identify User Stories or Tasks: User stories or tasks are the components of work that make up your project. They are the items you’ll be assigning story points to.

3. Gather the Team: The whole development team should participate in the estimation process. This often includes developers, testers, designers, and sometimes the product owner.

4. Conduct a Planning Poker Session: One common method for assigning story points is Planning Poker. Each participant is given a set of cards with the Fibonacci numbers on them. For each user story or task, each participant chooses a card representing their estimate of the effort required to complete that story or task.

5. Discuss the Estimates: Everyone reveals their estimate simultaneously once all participants have selected a card. If the estimates vary widely, the participants discuss their reasoning, led by the ones with the highest and lowest estimates. The goal isn’t to pressure team members to change their estimates but to share perspectives and assumptions.

6. Reach Consensus: After the discussion, the team conducts another round of Planning Poker. This process is repeated until the team reaches a consensus on the story points for a given user story or task.

7. Apply to All User Stories or Tasks: Repeat this process for each user story or task in your project.

8. Re-evaluate as Needed: It’s important to remember that estimates aren’t set in stone. If new information comes to light or a task is more complex than initially thought, it’s okay to re-evaluate and adjust your story points.

Remember that story points are a measure of effort, not time. The idea behind using the Fibonacci sequence is that the higher the number, the more uncertainty there is around the task and the effort to complete it. Using this non-linear scale, we acknowledge that as work gets larger and more complex, our ability to estimate it accurately diminishes.

Why Equating Story Points to Hours Is Problematic

Assigning a fixed number of hours to each story point undermines their primary purpose – enabling teams with varying productivity rates to agree on estimates. Equating hours with story points introduces unnecessary complexity and loses one main benefit – having a standard unit accommodating differing skill levels.

Loss of Abstraction in the Estimation Process

The power of story points lies in their abstract nature, which allows team members to focus on the relative effort required for tasks rather than getting bogged down by specific timeframes. When you convert story points into hours, this abstraction is lost, making it difficult for diverse scrum teams to reach a consensus during estimation sessions like planning poker. This can lead to disagreements or inaccurate projections when planning sprints and managing product backlogs.

Inaccurate Plans Due To Dependence On Individual Performance

In agile projects, individual performance varies greatly among team members. For instance, An experienced coder could finish a job more quickly than an inexperienced one. Converting story points into hours assumes that all developers work at the same pace, which is rarely true in practice. As such, hour-based estimations can result in unrealistic expectations about how long certain tasks will take and may even cause delays as stakeholders struggle to understand why progress isn’t aligning with initial predictions.

Factors That Affect Story Point Estimation

  • Different skill levels: Agile teams often consist of individuals with different experience levels and expertise areas; assigning fixed-hour values to story points can lead to skewed estimations that don’t accurately reflect the team’s capabilities.
  • Varied task complexity: Some tasks may be more complex than others, and equating hours with story points doesn’t account for this variability. This can result in underestimating or overestimating the time required for certain product backlog items.
  • Inconsistent work pace: Developers’ productivity levels fluctuate throughout a project due to factors like fatigue, stress, or learning curves. Using fixed-hour conversions ignores these fluctuations and assumes constant performance across all team members.

To make the most of agile estimation techniques like story point estimation, it’s crucial to avoid converting them into hours. Instead, embrace their abstract nature and focus on fostering collaboration among your diverse team members during sprint planning sessions. Using a story point estimation matrix, you can better understand and estimate story points more accurately, leading to more successful agile projects.

Key Takeaway: 

Equating story points to hours is problematic as it undermines their primary purpose of enabling teams with varying productivity rates to agree on estimates. The power of story points lies in their abstract nature, which allows team members to focus on the relative effort required for tasks rather than getting bogged down by specific timeframes. To make the most of agile estimation techniques like story point estimation, it’s crucial to avoid falling into the trap of converting them into hours and instead embrace their abstract nature while focusing on fostering collaboration among diverse team members during sprint planning sessions.

Agile Estimation Should Remain Abstract

In agile projects, using abstract units like story points allows team members with different skill levels to agree on the relative effort required for tasks without getting bogged down in specific timeframes. By maintaining this level of abstraction, teams can avoid complications from trying to convert story points into hours.

Embracing Relative Units Instead of Fixed Hour Values

Agile estimation uses relative units rather than assigning a fixed number of hours to each story point. This method enables developers who work at different speeds to collaborate effectively during sprint planning sessions and ensures that estimates are based on the overall effort involved rather than individual performance.

  • User stories: provide a high-level description of features or functionality that needs to be implemented in an application.
  • Story point estimate: a numerical value the scrum team assigns to indicate how much effort will be required to complete a user story.
  • Sprint planning: an event where scrum teams determine which product backlog items they will work on during the upcoming sprint and create their plan accordingly.

Encouraging Collaborative Discussions During Estimation Sessions

Maintaining abstraction in agile estimation promotes open communication among team members when discussing tasks such as user stories. Techniques like planning poker encourage team members to share their perspectives on the effort required for a task, leading to more accurate estimates and better overall project management.

For example, if a developer with extensive experience in database optimization believes that optimizing a specific query will take less time than another team member who is less familiar with this area of expertise, they can discuss their reasoning during the estimation session. This collaborative approach helps ensure everyone’s input is considered when determining story point values.

In summary, keeping agile estimation abstract by using relative units like story points allows teams to focus on the essential aspects of agile projects, such as collaboration and flexibility. Converting these estimations into fixed-hour values introduces unnecessary complexity and may lead to disagreements or inaccurate projections. By embracing abstraction in agile estimation, scrum teams can work together more effectively and deliver high-quality products within expected timelines.

Key Takeaway: 

Agile estimation is essential for effective planning and delivery of projects. Using abstract units like story points allows team members to collaborate effectively without getting bogged down in specific timeframes. Embracing relative units instead of fixed hour values promotes open communication among team members during estimation sessions, leading to more accurate estimates and better overall project management.

Real-life Example Demonstrating Issues With Hour Equivalence

In agile projects, developers have varying levels of experience and productivity. Let’s consider a scenario involving two developers: Superstar and Junior.

Superstar vs Junior Developer Scenario Analysis

Both Superstar and Junior estimate a user story as 5 story points each. If we assign an hour equivalence (e.g., 1 point = 1 hour), we might expect this task to take five hours for both developers. However, due to their different skill levels, Superstar completes the task in just three hours, while Junior takes seven hours. This discrepancy highlights how assigning fixed-hour values to story points fails at accurately capturing the relative effort required by individual team members.

Implications for Sprint Planning When Using Hour Equivalents

Converting story points into fixed hours can lead stakeholders astray during project management activities like sprint planning. By focusing on time-based estimates instead of abstract units representing effort, teams risk over- or underestimating tasks based on individual performance rather than collective capabilities.

  • Negative impact on velocity: Using hour equivalents skews the calculation of a team’s average velocity – an essential metric for determining how much work can be completed in a given sprint. This distortion makes it difficult to plan and allocate resources accurately.
  • Reduced flexibility: Relying on fixed-hour conversions may hinder teams’ adaptability to changes in scope or priorities during the project lifecycle. Agile methodologies emphasize responsiveness and adaptability, which rigid time-based estimates hinder.
  • Increased pressure on individual performance: Equating hours with story points can lead to burnout, reduced morale, and lower overall productivity. Team members might feel pressured to complete tasks within the assigned timeframe regardless of their skill level or experience.

In summary, using hour equivalents for agile estimation complicates planning and undermines the collaborative spirit of scrum teams. By sticking with abstract units like story points instead of fixed-hour values, stakeholders can better understand relative effort levels while maintaining an accurate perspective on project progress.

Key Takeaway: 

Assigning fixed-hour values to agile story points fails at capturing the relative effort required by individual team members, as their productivity levels vary. This can lead to over or underestimating tasks and negatively impact velocity, flexibility, and individual performance. Agile methodologies emphasize responsiveness and adaptability, which rigid time-based estimates hinder.

Distribution Relationship Between Story Points and Hours

It’s essential to be aware that there is no direct relationship between story points and hours. Instead, each user story has its own unique distribution of possible completion times based on various factors.

Understanding Distributions in the Context of Story Points

Factors such as complexity, uncertainty, and individual skill levels within the scrum team can all affect the distribution of completion times for a user story. For instance, a task with higher complexity will likely have a wider distribution due to increased variability in how long it takes different developers to complete it. Similarly, if there are many unknowns surrounding a user story or if requirements frequently change during sprint planning sessions, the time required for completion may vary significantly across multiple attempts at implementation. Lastly, team members with varying expertise might require different amounts of time when working on similar tasks, thus affecting overall project velocity calculations over several sprints.

Ensuring Accurate Plans Based on Average Team Velocity

Instead of attempting hour conversions for individual story points, teams should focus on their average velocity, measured in completed story points per sprint. This provides a more reliable indicator of how much work the team can handle during each iteration. By tracking velocity over time and adjusting plans accordingly, teams can better manage their product backlog and avoid over-committing resources or underestimating the effort required for upcoming tasks.

It’s important to note that agile estimation techniques like planning poker are not meant to be precise. Instead, they provide a framework for teams to estimate effort and plan accordingly. By embracing the distribution relationship between story points and hours, teams can maintain a flexible yet effective project management process that aligns with agile principles.

Understanding the distribution relationship between story points and hours improves planning accuracy while fostering better communication among team members. By focusing on average velocity instead of attempting direct hour conversions, scrum teams can make informed decisions based on historical data and avoid common pitfalls in agile projects.

Key Takeaway: 

Understanding the distribution relationship between story points and hours is crucial for effective sprint planning in agile projects. Rather than attempting hour conversions, teams should focus on their average velocity measured in completed story points per sprint to manage their product backlog better and avoid overcommitting resources or underestimating effort required for upcoming tasks. Agile estimation techniques like planning poker provide a framework for teams to estimate effort and plan accordingly while embracing flexibility and alignment with agile principles.

Utilising Velocity To Interpret Story Points

Forget about converting story points into hours. Instead, use velocity as a powerful tool to interpret estimates. By relating the size of a backlog item (in terms of story points) to the team’s average velocity, stakeholders gain valuable insights into how long tasks will likely take without resorting to fixed-hour conversions.

The Role of Velocity in Agile Project Management

Velocity is a crucial metric in scrum teams’ agile projects that measures the amount of work a team completes during each sprint. It is calculated by summing up all the story points assigned to user stories finished within a given time frame, typically one sprint. This metric helps teams and stakeholders understand their capacity to complete work and enables them to make informed decisions about future sprints and prioritisation of product backlog.

Tracking velocity over multiple sprints allows teams to identify trends and adjust their processes accordingly. For example, if a team consistently underestimates its workload or encounters unforeseen obstacles during development, it may need to reevaluate its estimation techniques or address other issues affecting productivity.

Communicating with Stakeholders Using Relative Effort Estimations

Instead of attempting to convert abstract units like story points directly into hours, it’s more beneficial for everyone involved in an agile project if communication focuses on relative effort estimations based on historical data from previous sprints’ velocities.

  • Average Team Velocity: Calculate your team’s average velocity by dividing the total number of completed story points across several past sprints by the number of those sprints. This provides a reliable baseline for estimating future sprint performance.
  • Forecasting: Use the average team velocity to forecast how many story points your team can complete in upcoming sprints, helping stakeholders understand when specific features or tasks might be completed and enabling better prioritization of product backlog items.
  • Adjustments: As your team’s velocity changes over time due to factors such as improved skills, process adjustments, or changing project requirements, regularly update your forecasts and communicate these updates with stakeholders to ensure everyone remains on the same page regarding expectations and timelines.

Velocity is a powerful tool for agile estimation and sprint planning. By utilizing it to interpret story point estimates, teams and stakeholders can make informed decisions about project management and product backlog prioritization.

Key Takeaway: 

Velocity is a metric in agile project management that measures the amount of work a team completes during each sprint. By utilising velocity to interpret story point estimates, teams and stakeholders can make informed decisions about project management and product backlog prioritization without resorting to fixed-hour conversions. Regularly updating forecasts and communicating with stakeholders ensures everyone remains on the same page regarding expectations and timelines.

FAQs in Relation to Agile Story Points

What are Agile Story Points and How to Use Them?

Agile story points are a measure of effort used to estimate user stories in an agile project, allowing teams to prioritize work and forecast completion times more accurately.

What Do 5 Story Points Mean in Agile?

5 story points in Agile indicate a task of moderate effort compared to other items in the product backlog.

Why Shouldn’t You Convert Story Points to Hours in Agile?

Converting story points to hours undermines the purpose of using abstract units for estimation in Agile, instead, use team velocity to gauge progress and predict timelines.

How to Determine the Number of Story Points for a 2-Week Sprint in Agile?

The number of story points for a two-week sprint depends on your team’s average velocity, which can be determined by tracking past performance across multiple sprints and adjusting future plans accordingly.

To finish

Agile Story Points are popular in agile projects, promoting teamwork and avoiding individual performance dependency.

Equating story points to hours can be problematic, leading to inaccurate plans and a loss of abstraction in the estimation process.

Understanding the distribution relationship between story points and hours is important for accurate planning based on average team velocity.

Utilising velocity to interpret story points allows for effective communication with stakeholders using relative effort estimations.

Learn with Fractal Systems!

Looking to upskill and boost your career prospects in the world of agile methodology? Look no further than Fractal Systems’ Agile Training!

Our team of real-world practitioners are active in the industry, so you can trust that the techniques you learn are tried and tested in real-life situations. Our training isn’t just a lecture-based session filled with boring PowerPoint slides – we know that interactive, discussion-based learning is the best way to ensure you retain what you’ve learned and are ready to apply it in your work.

Our Agile Training is not only informative but also enjoyable and fun! We believe that training shouldn’t be a chore, but an opportunity to develop new skills and meet like-minded professionals. Our sessions are designed to be fully interactive, with plenty of opportunities for discussion, group activities, and hands-on exercises.

By completing our Agile Training, you’ll gain valuable insights into the latest agile trends and techniques and be equipped with the skills and knowledge to apply them in your own workplace. Our team is dedicated to ensuring you get the most out of your training experience, and we’ll be with you every step of the way.

Don’t miss this opportunity to develop your career and enhance your skills. Sign up for Fractal Systems’ Agile Training today!

Further Agile Scrum Training

 Online Professional Scrum Master Training I (PSMI)

 Online Professional Scrum Master Training II (PSMII)

 Online Professional Scrum Product Owner (PSPO)

 Professional Scrum Product Owner Advanced (PSPO-A)

 Applying Professional Scrum (APS)